![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
i have seen a black family worshipping in East Ham Temple and a number of whites in ISKCON temple off oxford street. As also, the case of Gearge Harrison was not mentioned. So, added the section "interest in Britan" Any one who can think of a bettter title is welcome to change it. -- Hydman 12:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Wasn't there a Ganesh statue that drank milk in the UK?-- Dangerous-Boy 21:16, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
I have moved the article to Hinduism in the United Kingdom (from Hinduism in United Kingdom), as it is a more accurate name for the country. Furthermore, as What Links Here suggests, this article name is more sought after, which is possibly because other articles (I'm thinking predominantly of Islam in the United Kingdom) follow this formula. Bastin8 18:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
The following article is being considered for deletion.-- Coffeesuds 15:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
In UK, the Hindus (mostly from India) and the Muslims (mostly from Pakistan and Bangladesh) have now culturally and economically drifted apart. They now belong to opposite ends of social spectrum in UK. Many, perhaps most, UK Hindus do not wish to be identified with Pakistanis and Bangladeshi, and thus do not wish to be called "Asian" [1] [2] [3].
Hindus feel marginalized by the use of the term Asian:
The Bangladeshis and Pakistanis often have strong tensions between them as well. Internationally, Bangladesh generally has friendlier relations with India than with Pakistan. I do not quite see what this section was aiming at. Is there a part of the article that needs to be changed? There is a mention of how many Hindus left Bradford after the 2001 riots, where they often got targetted by criminal elements in both the Muslim and the White communities. Is there anything else that needs adding? Epa101 ( talk) 15:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't like the info box describing England as a Region. Can anyone change it? I can't see how to. Cheers Fishiehelper2 ( talk) 21:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hinduism in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Now that the copyvio has been removed, there's essentially nothing left in that page. Based on what is (and what was) in the page, the topic does not begin to meet our notability guideline for organisations. It would make sense to mention it briefly here. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 12:36, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
This has been open for months, with two supports and no opposition. I have gone ahead and performed the merge/redirect; if anyone wants to take issue with it, I am happy to discuss it further here. Vanamonde ( Talk) 23:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
> Among those of Indian origins, Hindus in the United Kingdom (27%) constituted the second largest group after Muslims of undivided India (57%), and exceeded Sikhs (14%) in the 2011 census of the United Kingdom.
This is not found in the cited source, which breaks down population by local authority, and the census only gathers ethnic identity by: Asian/Asian British: Indian Asian/Asian British: Pakistani Asian/Asian British: Bangladeshi Asian/Asian British: Chinese Asian/Asian British: Other Asian Which I presume Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi were totalled to produce a figure for "undivided india". This is:
I've currently cut it: I'm not sure it's central to the lead paragraph, but if we wanted to have a breakdown of how much of a given community is hindu, we could use the Asian/Asian british or Asian/Asian British:Inidan data? Adacable ( talk) 11:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)