From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed. [1] Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Well written, complies with key elements of MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    Ref #5 failed verification.
    Wait, have you watched the episode? All of the facts in the article are in the episode. Basilisk4u ( talk) 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    No I haven't watched the episode. There is no mention of the episode on the reference supplied. It may have been there once, but it isn't now. If you are citing a TV show please use the correct format as per {{ cite episode}}, specifying the exact time that the statements appear. Jezhotwells ( talk) 00:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    Oh! I'm sorry. The link seems to have redirected to a general Behind the Music page. I will try to find the times that the statements appear in the episode. Basilisk4u ( talk) 01:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    Okay, I have reformatted the episode stuff, I hope it is better now. Basilisk4u ( talk) 21:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    Other references appear to be RS, I assume good faith for off-line sources, no evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Thorough, without needless trivia
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Captioned, File:EarlyRHCP.jpg needs a specific fair use rationale for use in this article, see the notice on the file page. There is now a non-free FUR for this article, it is lacking for other articles that use the image. Jezhotwells ( talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, just two issues to fix. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells ( talk) 15:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    Fine, all in order now, passing as Ga. Congratulations! Jezhotwells ( talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply
    Awesome!! Thanks so much. Basilisk4u ( talk) 01:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC) reply