This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. A new edit request is recommended, using some of the independent sources identified in the discussion |
Chris ( talk) 19:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (
link)
We should revisit the treatment of founders as a whole, as it seems completely undue in the lede.
Using self-published sources about themselves to include mention of a non-notable person is problematic. Do they have something that looks like an authoritative history of their organization? -- Hipal ( talk) 19:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Why do you think self published sources are problematic? Chris ( talk) 13:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Rauch’s book is a secondary source that mentions the three founders. Chris ( talk) 14:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Other secondary sources are here: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/tough-choice-faces-the-heterodox-academy
https://cas.appstate.edu/news/sociology-professor-joins-prestigious-writers-group
Chris ( talk) 14:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm writing to follow up on this issue since there hasn't been further discussion. I don't see how WP:DUE or WP:NOTABILITY related to this topic. I'm not requesting a distinct Wikipedia page for myself. I don't expect my name to be hyperlinked (although like Nicholas Rosenkranz, I am a professor and have several peer reviewed publications.) I do expect the page to be factually accurate and unbiased. By omitting one co-founder (me), the page is biased and inaccurate. It's also bears mentioning that I'm the only cofounder that is a non-White immigrant to the U.S., so there's a larger bias issue. I have provided eight sources above to support the claim that there are three founders.
If you think I am not one of the cofounders, I would appreciate an explanation of how eight sources, including The Templeton Foundation, The Atlantic, a book by Jonathan Rauch, and another book by Eric Kaufmann (i.e., Whiteshift, see link below) mention that I'm one of the cofounders.
Link to relevant page in Whiteshift: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Whiteshift/F9mEDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22jonathan%20haidt%22%20%22Chris%20Martin%22%20%22heterodox%20academy%22&pg=PT408&printsec=frontcover&bsq=%22jonathan%20haidt%22%20%22Chris%20Martin%22%20%22heterodox%20academy%22
-- Chris ( talk) 18:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I just posted to WP:RSN to see if anyone there might want to weigh in. This is not meant as an attack on anyone; just because I sort of have quibbles and am not personally sure if they're right or I am just being pedantic. Cheers. Dumuzid ( talk) 21:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Two changes -- founder = Jonathan Haidt, Chris Martin, Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz
Text change: In 2015, Haidt was contacted by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, a Georgetown University law professor, who had given a talk to the Federalist Society discussing a similar lack of conservatives in law and similarly argued that this undermines the quality of research and teaching. [1] He was also contacted by Chris Martin, a sociology graduate student at Emory University, who had published a similar paper in The American Sociologist about the lack of ideological diversity in sociology. [2] [3] Haidt, Martin, and Rosenkranz formed "Heterodox Academy" to address this issue. [2] [4] [5] [6] [7]
GoldsteinGadfly
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).Heterodox Academy was founded in 2015 by Jonathan Haidt, Chris Martin, and Nicholas Rosenkranz, in reaction to their observations about the negative impact a lack of ideological diversity has had on the quality of research within their disciplines.
Heterodox Academy was founded in 2015 by psychologist Jonathan Haidt, sociologist Chris Martin, and legal scholar Nicholas Rosenkranz because all three worried that a lack of ideological diversity within their disciplines was impacting the quality of research
Chris ( talk) 13:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
He was also contacted by Chris Martin, a sociology graduate student at Emory University, who had published a similar paper in The American Sociologist about the lack of ideological diversity in sociology.from the sources provided, so I've not added that for now. If you have additional sources verifying that sentence feel free to post a new edit request and ping me by inserting
{{
ping|Asartea}}
in the text of the new request. --
Asartea
Talk |
Contribs
16:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)