This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This page does not mention anything related to how serious Moulinsart considers the protection of the Tintin copyrights. A poorly written addition yesterday was swiftly removed (see the history, or the diff itself). I agree that the writing should be better, and it is drawing conclusions too fast. However, I think the spirit of the contribution has merit and should be part of this article. The current ruling in the Netherlands (meaning that Hergé does not own the copyrights but Casterman does) might have some serious ramifications, and only time will tell how this ruling will effect Moulinsart. There are plenty of high quality news outlets that have reported on the issue (in either Dutch or French, haven't found an English source yet):
Someone at the forum tintinologist.org reflects seriously upon the verdict: http://www.tintinologist.org/forums/index.php?action=vthread&forum=7&topic=5462
The Adventures of Tintin: Memorabilia_and_merchandise makes a reference to how Moulinsart considers the issue of defending its copyrights:
Prhartcom, you seem to have an interest in this subject. What is your opinion on the recent Dutch verdict regarding the copy rights? Do you agree it should be included here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidovitch 007 ( talk • contribs) 09:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Should the article be renamed as such per this press release? Blake Gripling ( talk) 09:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)