![]() | Hello Garci scandal was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is a "prayer joke"? Ejrrjs | What? 00:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
I hope that eventually the GMA administration will succeed in eliminating the "People Power" phenomenon that, whilst still considered "good" a few years ago, is now a dirty tactic of those who want to usurp power from a duly elected government.
This is a copy of a post in the Tambayan
Hey people. I have a feeling that something big is going to happen politically in the country today, Sept 7, or tommorrow, Sept 8. Perhaps a new president? New government? Lots of people are mobilizing and I mean mobilizing and that reminds me of you know what during 1986 and 2001. That is why I am asking if anyone would object, or possibly vote for, starting an article by the temporary name of 2005 Philippine revolution? My connections also are using a color or a flower for the name of the event eh. -- Noypi380 07:51, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
This article explains why the impeachment proceedings failed - [1]. A few main points:
Not sure how this should be integrated into the article, but I think it clarifies the legal background a bit-- Confuzion 07:31, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
From the new article mentioned earlier, some lawyers were saying that "Impeachment proceedings" did not actually commence, since there was no successful complaint that made it to the senate, because none of the complaints had 79 signatures. Hence, a brand spanking new complaint can be made again, even right now? Apparently, the one year ban only applies when a complaint has already made it to the senate, since "proceedings" applies to the trial and not any discussions earlier. A complaint can only be complaint if it is transmitted, just like a bill can only be a law after it is signed. If it was not signed by 79, there is no complaint, and someone can propose a complaint all over again. This cycle can only stop if one proposed complaint is transmitted or if the congressman get tired of it. Any law experts out there who can correct that? Just wanted to check. -- Noypi380 07:52, 9, September 2005 (UTC)
Can someone help out in updating this article? The crisis has certainly abated, which is not reflected in the current state of the article. Now the chief issues of the day are the ongoing economic + political reforms, which is not part of the electoral crisis anyhow. Mostly the new issues today are about the new taxes that will chop down the gov's deficit and the preparations for the budgets for 2006 and 2007. With that in mind, perhaps its time to finalize the article. Comments anyone? I would like to trim certain sections (evidence and trials sections) since the crisis has winded dowm. But I am not sure where to start. Suggestions anyone? -- Noypi380 10:33, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
The article, I believe, is almost finalized. If you are an expert on English, pls feel free to fix grammer, spelling, etc. Any comments, problems, etc are welcome now too. Thanks. -- Noypi380 15:03, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
The article is now placed under peer review. Constructive criticism would be much appreciated. :) -- Noypi380 11:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
To all editors/commentators/etc.: if you plan to leave commentary on the issue, please do on the talk page and not on the main article. Thanks! -- Akira123323 12:23, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Judging that while the impeachment case has been quashed but of course the crisis seems to have been revived in my opinion (especially the return of Virgilio Garcillano to Manila), can it be said that this issue is once again a current event? I really don't know. -- Akira123323 15:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
It may be better to view this as a political crisis, and not an electoral crisis per se, as so many controversies are ongoing at the same time: the question of the 2004 elections; the alleged wiretapping; the question of the alleged cover-up with regards to the wiretapping; Garcillano's flight and reappearance; Congressional investigations because of the wiretapping and Garci; resignations; charter change as the solution to the crisis, etc. The crisis is ongoing and has never really stopped -and now there is the question of fears of military intervention. Gareon 14:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
It is proposed that
2005 Philippine electoral crisis be moved to
Hello Garci scandal, since most of the media uses "Hello Garci", and not the current title. Pls. vote. :)--
Noypi380
04:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Whoever uploaded/placed this picture, please revise the caption. The grammar is a bit cumbersome and I'm not quite sure what the caption is trying to say, or who the pictured person is or what he is saying. -- AladdinSE 22:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I did some rewording myself. Please review. -- AladdinSE 22:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
I don't think it's fair for this article to cite references that formed articles of Randy David. Just this week, David was arrested, without a warrant of arrest, by the police authority acting on behalf of President Arroyo's directives of "suppressing" a "threat" to the government. This is in line with the Presidential Proclamation 1017 placing the entire country to a "state of national emergency" due to the perceived "clear and present danger" of rebellion rumors. It may be noticed that Randy David, a UP professor and a columnist in the progressive Philippine Daily Inquirer, is an open critic of the administration. If WIKI cite sources coming from his materials, wouldn't it be bias, and an obvious anti-GMA article? ( Condorhero )
IMHO "scandal" is better. -- Howard the Duck | talk, 13:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Now that the impeachment has been filed, we cano create 2006 impeachment case of Gloria Arroyo, or the Impeachment case of Gloria Arroyo if we would merge the 2005 and 2006 cases. -- Howard t he Du c k 02:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
There are a lot of statements in the article that need citation.-- Pinay06 22:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
This article was nominated for good article reassessment to determine whether or not it met the good article criteria and so can be listed as a good article. The article was delisted. Please see the archived discussion for further information. Majoreditor ( talk) 18:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The image File:Garci01.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 18:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 17:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Hello Garci scandal. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)