This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing
the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
assess and improve articles to
good and
1.0 standards, or visit the
wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
The first paragraph of the article states, "The term "Heka" was also used for the practice of magical
ritual and, through the
Coptic word "
hik", is the source of the word "
magic".
Etymology of Magic: late 14c., "art of influencing events and producing
marvels," from O.Fr. magique, from L. magice "sorcery, magic," from Gk. magike (presumably with tekhne "art"), fem. of magikos "magical," from magos "one of the members of the learned and priestly class," from O.Pers. magush, possibly from PIE *magh- "to be able, to have power".
Yes you are right this article is confusing and does not give sources for some of the ideas e.g. that Heka means activation of the ka. This may be true but would require He to mean activate which I am not at all sure about. I think what may be being suggested in a rather circular way is that a term for ritual gave rise to a term for magic but Heka is clearly not the source of the English word magic. So I will remove that part.
Apepch7 (
talk)
22:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)reply
This looks more like Harpocrates than Heka - the source says its from Denderah and is Heka the child - I have never come across this epithet before. Anyone familiar with Denderah?
Apepch7 (
talk)
20:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)reply
I've never been to Dendera (unfortunately), but I do think the image is credible. Wilkinson says that in the Late Period Heka was depicted as a child, so Dendera was built after Heka began to be depicted that way. For the most part, I think the child forms of Egyptian deities loked alike. The notes for the image file call it "Heka-pa-chered", which resembles the Egyptian name of Horus the Child, "Har-pa-chered", which the Greeks rendered as "Harpocrates". I suppose somebody might have confused the two, but it seems more likely that "pa-chered" means "the child", and the Dendera relief is depicting Heka the Child. The file also claims to be taken from a public-domain work by
Auguste Mariette, who presumably read hieroglyphs well enough to know what god he was looking at.
A. Parrot (
talk)
20:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Any relation?
Considering Heka is the god of magic, is there any connection to the Greek goddess
Hecate? Given the somewhat overlapping domains and the similarity in the names I'd be surprised if there wasn't some sort of connection, but I realize it could hypothetically be a coincidence, too, especially as the more-detailed seeming Hecate article makes no mention of Heka (though, strangely, it says her name has been "compared" to the Egyptian goddess of childbirth).
Is there any scholarly study on this possibility? I'm not familiar with anthropology circles enough to know off the bat what would be a Reliable Source in that field.
108.188.199.60 (
talk)
18:31, 12 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Vorziblix and I agreed, and nobody has objected in 7 months. We discussed moving this page to a different title, but I'd rather do that separately, later.
A. Parrot (
talk)
18:59, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The article
heku discusses the selfsame concept as this one and should probably be merged into
Heka (god); as the etymology section of this article says, they represent the same Egyptian word, ḥkꜣ(w). The article titles just use different anglicizations. The only difference between the articles is that one takes the personification of this concept as a god as its starting point, whereas the other starts with it as an abstraction, but each goes on to talk about the other. Separating them doesn’t make much sense. —
Vorziblix (
talk)
16:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Support. I always wanted to make this change myself, but I never bothered to propose the merge, figuring I'd take care of it when I got around to rewriting the article. I liken heka to maat. Both are concepts that are indispensable to understanding Egyptian religion, and both are personified by deities who are not very prominent compared with other members of the pantheon. Maat the goddess and maat the concept are covered in a single article, and we can treat Heka the god and heka the concept the same way.
A. Parrot (
talk)
00:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
On second thought, though, I agree with the merge but don't think the merged article's title should be "Heka (god)". As I said, the concept of heka was much more important than the deity as a deity. Unfortunately,
heka is a disambiguation page, so we need some kind of disambiguator in the title of the merged article. "Heka (concept)" might work.
A. Parrot (
talk)
05:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've merged the two pages, although the text at
Heku was so poorly written that I didn't actually copy any of its text; I just mentioned a few deities that it mentioned into this article. I should rewrite the page so it properly explains this concept, which is integral to Egyptian religion.
A. Parrot (
talk)
19:19, 29 September 2018 (UTC)reply
misquote
You misquoted Goelet. Actually the passage from Paul Mirecki's sarcophage script reads:
"I am he whom the Unique Lord MADE* before Duality had yet come into being..."
So, Heka DID NOT exist before duality had yet come into being.