This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
I am not sure who put the "contradiction" tag on, can the author explain? It also seems that the last sentence (about "not being a cause for WWII") belongs on the talk page. Then maybe the contested statement could be changed.
Eugen Ivan06:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Both the last sentence "not being a cause for WWII" and the first sentence "was LARGELY responsible for the outbreak of WWII" have been removed. Who wrote this who thinks they have the sociological authority to designate this one concept THE MOST IMPORTANT factor leading to WWII. That's just absurd.
Hvatum17:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Heim ins Reich. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Missing the deaths of the Polish original inhabitants, their reactions, including mass kiling of these settlers (e.g. in the Cieszyn village near Lublin: 160 murdered by the AK partisans), post WW2 fates etc.
Zezen (
talk)
12:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Eddy de Bruyne & Marc Rikmenspoel
In re this edit:
[1], Marc Rikmenspoel is a Waffen-SS apologist; he's included in this section:
Waffen-SS_in_popular_culture#Popular_history. Eddy de Bruyne is an author of unknown credentials; the only thing I see about him is that he had contacts with the Walloon legion troopers
[2] & collects wartime photos of Leon Degrelle & the legion's personnel:
[3]. I should not have used "trivia" in the edit summary, but these authors are not reliable sources for the topic of this article. --
K.e.coffman (
talk)
12:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)reply