This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Health literacy.
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kvo.hi, Alohabringschange.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gabbyblandino.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 22:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Samuelauger, Jmtanis.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 23:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
whoever you are, you violated your own suggestions with your revisions of the revisions. the more useful and polite approach would have been to ask for citations here or realize the citations were already embedded within the page if you simply knew the literature being cited ... versus your wholesale deletes. Really disrespectful of you. Go edit somewhere else please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.85.178.161 ( talk) 02:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted recent changes by user 67.85.178.161.
Usually, substantial changes to a researched and referenced article should be introduced on this discussion page first.
In general, there are the following issues:
1. The edit summaries are blank (see Wikipedia: Edit summary).
2. There are no references given for the statements:
3. Statements such as:
4. Please do not remove references that don't agree with an editor's opinion.
5. Beginning the article with the statement There is no single definition of health literacy currently accepted by all practitioners or researchers is of no value to the reader looking for the definition. Controversies about the definition should be illustrated in the body of the article and appropriately referenced. See WP:V.
Ryanjo ( talk) 20:26, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
In October 2015 HealthLiteracyConsulting gave a timeline of of the history of health literacy. This information is not properly cited but may contain useful suggestions. Diannaa blocked this user. They might have been promoting https://www.iha4health.org, seemingly a commercial organization which presents a conference. Still I would have welcomed the contribution with formatting, better citations, and disclosure, and hope they take Diannaa's cue to disclose and comply with user naming guidelines. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Health literacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Health literacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Health literacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello all,
I am planning to add some more content to this Wiki article in the upcoming days. I intend to make two primary changes:
I hope these changes sit well with all whose contributions have made this article a reliable source for many seeking information about Health Literacy.
Thank you. Gabbyblandino ( talk) 01:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC)gabbyblandino
I'd like to suggest the removal of the sections Alternative Approaches great and Oral health literacy in school teachers of Mangalore, India. Both are soley based on single studies that aren't frequently cited it seems odd to give them their own section.
Hi everyone,
I just finished reading the paper by Ilgun et al (2015-02-12). "Health Literacy". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. International Conference on New Horizons in Education, INTE 2014, 25–27 June 2014, Paris, France. 174: 2629–2633. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.944. ISSN 1877-0428; Cited in the article here (reference 4).
This paper is poorly written, and although Social and Behavioral Sciences is a decent journal, they really seemed to drop the ball with this paper. Some sections of the paper are just nonsensical, and so poorly written making it difficult to follow and understand. For example, see the Introduction of the paper: "To shorten length of treatment period and to increase nursing quality is directly proportional with adaptation level to recommendations given by doctor. Following doctor’s advice is related to the communication quality of doctor and patient (Russo-Innamorato, 2011). Doctor-patient relationship takes shape according to personalities of doctor and the patient. As well, doctorpatient relationship affect from many factors such as cultural, social, economic, psychological and ethics (Koch and Turgut, 2004)" The text is poorly written and is not very clear, and this problem is throughout this paper.
Is this really a reference that should be cited in wikipedia? Aren't there any better references to cite on this topic?
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 October 2023 and 9 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LittleLadyBigCity ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sn2609748.
— Assignment last updated by Bmitch18 ( talk) 04:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kiki6789 ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Kiki6789 ( talk) 18:05, 26 October 2023 (UTC)