This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food for thought. A quick-n-dirty web search throws up the top ten results being entirely to do with personal hazards (biohazard protection, eyewear, fire protection wear, etc). While it's certainly not a substantative enough search to warrant a firm association, I would gather from that simple check that hazard protection has more to do with mitigating personal injury or group injury than the broader ACAT concepts that risk management deals with.

That said, if the article is to avoid merge-status, it does need to be developed more. The question is: is there enough out there to make an article out of, without running into original research issues, or is this just a buzzword-concept that can be redirected into emergency management and/or risk management as a three-sentence concept clause. - 207.102.144.28 ( talk) 17:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply