I linked to this article from the PhysX article. There, half the text and a number of the links were about Havok as a competitor. The Havok page, on the other hand, has absolutely no text about PhysX. I'm not certain if this discussion is the best place for this comment or the one for the other page, so I'll add to both.
It was suggested that this article should be renamed Havok. The vote is shown below:
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. violet/riga (t) 13:43, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
Perfect Dark Zero uses Havok right? It's listed. But Xbox 360 isn't listed as Havok compatible.-- 128.146.68.89 03:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, Perfect Dark Zero does use Havok. Havok is X-360 compatible Siofra 22:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
According to X-Play Bungee invented their own physics engine, so why is it on the list of games that use Havok? Playwrite 14:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
I dont think bungie said anything about Halo 3's pysics engine. should it be removed, it is speculation. 68.190.230.156 05:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Its written on the rear of the Halo 3 case that havok physics is being used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.72.136 ( talk) 20:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Please add any known sources or information that describe the differences between the major versions of Havok. Thank you. 71.129.204.122 00:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
is this the engine being used in Gears of War?
No, and Epic developed Gears of War Siofra
how does this compare with the Unreal Engine(s), past and present?
The L-O-N-G list of supported games was getting longer than the actual article - and kinda pointless. I moved the content over to List of games using physics engines - but to be honest, that list is also kinda pointless. If you want to continue adding to it - feel free. SteveBaker 14:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm putting this article up for speedy deletion, since it fulfills the requirements set out in Wikipedia:Spam#Advertisements masquerading as articles. For example, it uses "we", which clearly indicates the content was written by the company. Benandorsqueaks 21:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Nevermind, I realized I should just revert to previous edit. I should have checked that first. Benandorsqueaks 22:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that's the real name of the company, if it's incorporated in Ireland. "Inc." is an American thing. An Irish company would be "Ltd.", "Co. Ltd.", "PLC", or a few other things... -- Zilog Jones 22:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Skywalker, May I please ask why my additions were pointless? I think that this purchase is worth noting on even if it is already avaliable on the Intel Website.-- KevinTraver 20:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
First off Havok FX is not cancelled, and secondly the link of AMDs Director is a personal utterance and should be regarded as such. Besides the most obvious fact that GPU Physics is the coming trend is seen in CryEngine 2 and their CryPhysics implementation which at the current state is about 2 or three years back from where Havok is nowadays. It is just that Multiple GPU installations aren`t established so far, for a magnitude of reasons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.53.9 ( talk) 17:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Back when there where a mere handful of titles using Havok, having a list of them made sense. Now there are hundreds of them with several more added every month. Our list will never be complete. If anyone thinks having such a list is in any way useful - make a separate 'List of...' article. All we really need here at this stage are a few NOTABLE examples - perhaps the first ever commercial game to use it and a couple of the most notable titles. If we do that, we should write it as a prose paragraph - not a list - or else the cruft-merchants will just add to it again.
Meanwhile - I did the "Be Bold" think and simply nuked the list.
SteveBaker ( talk) 05:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Because anyone knows that 'PS3' and 'Xbox 360' are platforms, not types of OS -- Topperfalkon ( talk) 17:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Havoklogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
"...intelligence in massive falling things"
...What? -- 64.9.97.44 ( talk) 23:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
the list of Havoc game are her Titles that use Havok Products [1](show in new Tape) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.252.20.178 ( talk) 00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
I've contacted Intel regarding the broken link, and will post any feedback as it comes and/or offer suggestions for resolution.-- Topperfalkon ( talk) 16:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
I saw that the list was previously nuked, however, it appears that the list is back.
What's the feeling on this list? Are we going to only put a few games on it as examples? If so, we need to say something to the effect of "A few of the games that use the Havok engine are". If we're going to put ALL the games that use the Havok engine, then I agree that we need a separate page "games_that_use_havok" or "games_that_use_havok_engine". Or are we just going to nuke it again?
I can make a spider to crawl Wiki and find which ones have Havok listed as their engine, but first I need to know what we're even doing with said list.
Zaftikins ( talk) 19:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Havok (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Havok (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)