This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kurdistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Kurdistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KurdistanWikipedia:WikiProject KurdistanTemplate:WikiProject KurdistanKurdistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Turkey and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Assyria, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Assyrians are indogenous people to Hakkari! Who is putting in Assyrian POV in everyarticle!?!?
First of all, when you are writing in wikipedia close off with 4 tidles (~) to show your identity. Don't make me come over to east turkey and chop your fingers off. Second, the asuri christians are native of anatolia, unlike you indo-iranians who migrated to the mountanous areas of present day north iraq. Untill 1915 you did not have anything to do with turkey, let alone claiming parts of it. The majority of these assyrian christians look anatolian and could easily mengle with the turkish population of turkey which is also in majority native to its homeland (excluding kurds). As a turk I am of the opinion that you kurds should be exiled to iraq in return for the assyrian christians who left in wwI. Exiling our anatolian brothers and sisters was a big mistake which was only because we thought they were armenian. And Hakkari is indeed a homeland of the assyrian christian, just as the provinces of urfa, diyarbakir, batman, bitlis and siirt. End of story.
77.250.189.211 (
talk)
04:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)reply
"85% Assyrians lived in surrounding Hakkari"
(This is not a denial that they were in majority or that there wasn't a genocide.) —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
85.105.159.74 (
talk •
contribs) 10:31, 21 November 2006.
I agree. I dont know who added this. But the point the person was trying to make that that number of Assyrians were much higher 100 years ago in Hakkari then it is today. I remember reading quite a few books stating that Hakkari had a Christian majority and had a population in the hundred of thousand, but that Christian population had Armenian elements as well
Chaldean03:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)reply
Maybe most of slaughters could be Kurdish, but ethnic identities of Kurds, Turks ... were not established. And they called themselves Muslim. Thank you.
Takabeg (
talk)
14:53, 14 October 2010 (UTC)reply
Tabi. Kendilerini müslüman olarak tanımlıyorlardı. Kaynaklara bakıldığında Soykırımı işleyen, Balkan ve Kafkas göçmenleri (Balkan göçmenlerin büyük bir çoğunluğu Türk ama yine kendilerini müslüman olarak tanımlıyorlardı). Birde Hamidiye Alayları ise Kürt (bunlar da yine müslüman). Ama burada Kurds dediğimiz zaman gayri-müslüm Kürtleri de dahil edilmiş olacak. Neyse ben kaynaklandıracağım. Ancak Bedirhan Massacre için Kürt aşiretlerinden olduğu belirtileblir.
Takabeg (
talk)
15:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)reply
It was done by regular Ottoman Army and Kurdish irregulars.
[1] I am not the one who added that peice of info and you are the one who blanked the section and you start accusing people of spreading agendas! p.s. please sign your comments with 4 tildes.--Rafytalk19:14, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
I'm not spreading propaganda, you so called 'Assyrians' are spreading propaganda with clear indication that you have claim on the land (Funny I know), like I said, it was done by Muslims! and the ethnicity of the people was insignificant!
Maybe we should break down the American army into groups and discuss how a Latino, Italian, Irish etc people did what? what ever the american army does is in the name of America, you can't blame the different ethnic groups with in, likewise what ever the ottomans did was in the name of the ottoman empire and not Kurdish nationalism.
I can't feel but to feel that I'm being trolled by a Kurdish nationalist who doesn't sign his posts. I am not claiming any lands, I am not asking any one to apologise or repent, there are simply some reliable info that are related and it can be added here. If you have a source that claims that Kurdish irregulars weren't involved then please do add it. Otherwise I will revert (exclamation mark)--Rafytalk19:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Your the one doing the trolling, I don't see why an article about a city needs that information anyway. Like I explained to you above, I'm not denying the Kurds may have took part, however they did so in the name of the ottomans and ethnic groups were insignificant! so I don't see why you need to list the ethnic groups with in the ottoman army, like I said America too has many groups in their armed forces, do you see people listing them? no, therefor you can't list the ottoman army groups. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kurdwiki (
talk •
contribs)
19:38, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
But they were not part of the regular Ottoman Army since they had a semi-autonomous status. Those areas were even claimed by Kurdish leaders to be part of an
independent Kurdish state at the ensuing peace conference.--Rafytalk19:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Did they or did they not join the ottomans? what do you know? average nationalist Kurds were also affected if you didn't know, so like I said we will leave it as the ottoman army as that's what it was. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kurdwiki (
talk •
contribs)
19:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
They joined as a independent party just like the UK joined the US in its war, should we consider them both as one party? Anyway your arguments don't make sense so I'm considering you edits
WP:BF, please dont revert back otherwise you will be breaking the
WP:3RR.--Rafytalk20:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Historical Hakkari article
I intend on creating a kind of a fork article of the historical region known as Hakkari. Just like how it's done with
Nineveh and
Ninawa Governorate,
Macedonia (country) and
Macedonia (region)...etc. This would mean however that all wikilinks that deal with a period prior to the formation of modern Turkey will be directed to the new article. Does anyone have objections here? --Rafytalk14:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)reply
It probably depends on the focus of the article. If it is more focused on pre-Ottoman history, then I think the current links should go to the modern Turkey version since there is a continuity between the Ottoman sancak of Hakkari and the modern province of Hakkari. If it is more on the Ottoman period, then I think your suggestion is best. If it is a mix of both then it's hard to say until it is written! You might want to create it and then ask again before changing any links.
Ordtoy (
talk)
14:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Great, I will start the article soon. I think however that the region wasn't confined with a specific administrative region during the Ottoman rule. Some of the literature I read depicts Hakkari encompassing parts of Mosul and Van vilayets.--Rafytalk21:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)reply
If I'm not mistaken the Ottoman sandjak (which was in Van vilayet) is more or less equivalent to today's province except for a few small parts on the border which are in Iraq (at the time Mosul vilayet). This needs proper verification.
Ordtoy (
talk)
00:47, 3 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Should this page really be spelled with an "â" since it is not in the official name? I suggest we change it to "Hakkari". I don't see any reason to keep it like this since it is an unofficial spelling.
It's not possible to add anything related to Assyrians, which are the Indigenous people of Hakkari, without it getting deleted by random wikipedia accounts. It's very disappointing that the admins don't do anything against it and allow Kurds to spread their propaganda on these articles. I edited the real meaning of Hakkari with word books of Universities, but the change got deleted. On the other article that I edited about
Hakkari, the Syriac name got deleted. It's very disappointing that Wikipedia allows Kurdish propaganda to dwell on such articles that discriminate the Assyrian people.
FalitoMardinoyo47 (
talk)
10:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply