From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One one side

@ Auric: You are quite right ( diff), I didn't spot that I was editing a quote here. Perhaps [sic?] might be better than [sic], though, since the cited url doesn't have an image of the original paper. It could be a slip by whoever created the web page. -- John of Reading ( talk) 13:44, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Given that the cited date of the original paper is Feb 13, 1905, I choose to believe that it is likely that is it is a typo original to the source, but I'll add the q-mark just in case. Thanks.-- Auric talk 15:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC) reply