This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gustavus Blin Wright article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from Gustavus Blin Wright appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 24 May 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm a tad puzzled over the stub class rating. I don't assess articles, certainly the ones I begin, but I thought stubs were short and/or incomprehensible. Like it says on the quality scale for stubs: The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. I would like to think this article is neither, although it certainly can be improved upon. So could you please explain your assessment? CindyBo 07:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Gustavus Blin Wright. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)