This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
cities,
towns and various other
settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
Language
I have done a quick copy edit and found the quality of writing to be quite good. Coherent, informative, grammatical, and to the point. A pleasant read. Cheers, · · ·
Peter Southwood(talk): 12:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. Looking forward to reading it!
—Ganesha811 (
talk) 20:16, 22 July 2022 (UTC)reply
I've just seen the nominator's request to take a no-exceptions 1 year break from Wikipedia, and to therefore fail all their current GA nominations. If I was in a position to pass this article with minimal changes, I would implement them myself, but unfortunately I think this article needs more work than that and so it will not pass right now. I look forward to welcoming the nominator back and possibly reviewing this article again in a year!
—Ganesha811 (
talk) 14:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)reply
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline.
2b.
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
Provisional pass; just one question. I see that many of the images are taken by the local city government - as Indonesia is a unitary state, I assume this means they are public-domain because there is no copyright distinction between the "Government of Indonesia" (nationwide) and any local government authority, correct?
What is Adu Zatua? If not explained in text it should be explained or linked in the image caption.
1970s boom grammar issue: should be "saw a short-lived tourism boom" not "seen a short-lived tourist boom", infrastructure should be singular
Substitute in "US Navy personnel together with Indonesian army troops at Binaka Airport following the 2005 earthquake"
"Traditional Nias attire. Ethnic Nias..." rather than "Nias people"
Remove "the city has a significant population of..."
"the main hospital"
7. Overall assessment.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I'll take this nomination—I'll take up to a week to get round to it. This review will be used for
Wikicup points. Please consider reviewing an article yourself—the backlog is long, and the
WP:GAN list promotes nominators with a good reviewing score.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 22:58, 12 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Captions could be improved. I note that issues raised in the last GA review have not been resolved. Grammar/precision is low.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A fairly good article—I'll do a copyedit run-through before promotion. All the ingredients for a GA are here.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 16:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The governance section doesn't need three separate subsections (see
MOS:OVERSECTION). The table in the politics section would work better as prose—it doesn't really say anything.
The agriculture and industries sections could be combined.
The same goes for the tourism and landmarks sections.
The grammar is rather wonky, but as I said, I'll do a general copyedit.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 16:46, 17 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.