This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
anime,
manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
added spin-off, revised some more areas, all episodes for spinoff are there with airted date...someone else can finsih adding them
Mokaiba11 (
talk)
10:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Images FYI
FYI
One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.
Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:
The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
The nature of the copyrighted work
The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
my edits are not an edit war if I am adding content to the artice, the one at fault for this edit war is Farix who keeps reverting to an old page without the new additions and he doesnt even write in the discussion.
Mokaiba11 (
talk)
21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
An edit war is when two parties are continually reverting back and forth. Two parties. Either two people are edit warring, or no one is. You can't try to claim high ground and state "my edits are not an edit war, but HIS ARE!" -- it doesn't make sense. If Farix is edit warring against you, then you are warring against him by definition. Stop it, and wait for other editors to chime in.
Jsharpminor (
talk)
21:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
I've attempted to clean up the mess that Mokaiba made of the article and get it to conform with other article in the same subject area. However, it is Mokaiba who has been reverting every all of my attempts sight unseen and even requesting
rollback privileges so that they can "revert faster".
[1] Mokaiba has show a blatant
WP:OWNership over the article and has prevented other users from making changes to their edits. At no point did I actually revert Mokaiba. Instead, I've attempted to reformat the contents to match Wikipedia's standards and remove anything that was obviously
original research, such as the over half dozen "genres" Mokaiba tried to add, extrusions plot detail, or just didn't belong, such as a non-English licensee in an English licensee field and two obsolete infobox fields. —Farix (
t |
c)
21:47, 10 August 2011 (UTC)reply
Shifting out commented out material
The article is full of material that is commented out and thus invisible to readers. Some of it has been this way for nearly 9 months. I can see from the talkpage that there has been a bit of argument over what should be removed and what should stay and I don't want to get into that, but commenting out large swaths of text for months-long periods is not an appropriate use of comments per
WP:COMMENT. I'm moving the material here for the time being.
If this material can be re-incorporated into the article then that's fine, but if not it should be removed from the article and not simply commented out. -
Thibbs (
talk)
23:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Gunparade March. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.