This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article was
copy edited by
Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 19, 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
i resently bought guilty gear x after looking it up on wiki it has endings for the game but when i played arcade mode there where no story endings —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
207.109.29.142 (
talk)
01:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC).reply
Petit and i-mode games
I'm not sure the Petit games really belong here. Also, the article on the whole series suggests the Guilty Gear Club game is based on the original GG, not X. I know nothing of this game personally, but the name 'chaos gauge' supports that, as well as the character selection. --
Elcalen (
talk)
19:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)reply
"It was released in July 2000 for Japanese arcades, and re-released in different versions for different platforms: Dreamcast, Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 2 and Game Boy Advance" - doesn't say when the release of the console versions were (something of a norm for VG articles)
"The Advance Edition includes tag-team" - is the game actually called The Advance Edition or is it referring to just the GBA version? I thought it must be capitalised for a reason
"Guilty Gear was successful after its initial May 14, 1998 release " - I would link the first game here as it caused me confusion to which game it was referring to
This is an excellent article, I'll wait for those minor issues to be clarified but after that this should be good to go ☠Jaguar☠11:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the response, it all looks good and should comply per the GA criteria. I've also realised the confusion regarding the Advance port. Yep we should be good to go ☠Jaguar☠21:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)reply