Greek ironclad Spetsai has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 18, 2013. ( Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the military of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force World War I task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greek ironclad Spetsai/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 ( talk · contribs) 20:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Images:

• Spetse2b.jpg needs US public domain tag (although it is obvious that PD applies).
• Ditto for Hydra Brasseis1902.png.
  • Good catch on both of those. Parsecboy ( talk) 16:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Prose:

• In ... sortied from the Dardanelles at 9:30. does the 9:30 mean am or pm?
  • Fixed now.
    • Added "in the morning" to clarify - please revert if you consider this redundant.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Nice article, with very little to mend in terms of the GAR. Good work!-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 10:58, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reviewing the article, Tomobe03. Parsecboy ( talk) 16:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

You're welcome. All clear - happy to pass.-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 20:03, 18 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Here of the ship. Parsecboy ( talk) 19:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC) reply