This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles
This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
A fact from Greco (grape) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 December 2009 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Oppose unless there is better evidence that they are the same. The source I found indicates that it may be related to Greco, but not the same as it.[1]
L. Costantini, A. Monaco, J.F. Vouillamoz, M. Forlani, M.S. Grando (2015).
Genetic relationships among local Vitis vinifera cultivars from Campania (Italy). VITIS-Journal of Grapevine Research. 44 (1): 25–34: "The genotypes of 4 accessions of Asprinio and 11 accessions of Greco di Tufo are identical at a total of 16 microsatellite loci, which demonstrates the synonymy of these 2 varieties, as was indicated by ampelographic descriptions" (page 31).
Miszatomic, I have to ask: did you actually read that source before you removed the merge tag? Because if so, it's hard to understand your reasoning. By the way, I don't think a discussion in which the last post was within the last 24 hours can really be considered "stale". Would you like to reconsider?
Justlettersandnumbers (
talk)
15:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Having had a look at the Constantini paper (which is 2005, rather than 2015; although this isn't important), I tend to agree now agree with the argument that they are genetically the same grape variety. However, there is more to a grape than its genes - including viticultural practices and cultural interpretation. Either way, I'm quite neutral on whether they should be merged or not. I've added an additional brief mention the genetic identity on the Asprinio page; perhaps such bilateral linking is sufficient.
Klbrain (
talk)
10:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)reply