This   level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present.

The "controversial" suggestion about a 5.9 day variation in G is not worth including. There is better evidence against it than for it. Plus, it is theoretically unsupported.

I suggest removal.

The astronomical evidence against time variation of G is worth mentioning. Wcmead3 ( talk) Wcmead3 ( talk) 04:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC) reply

This is an intriguing puzzle that has persisted for several years. If there is significant research reported that helps resolve the matter, it should be described and referenced in this article. Wcmead3 ( talk) Wcmead3 ( talk) 04:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Newtonian gravity is a force in the usual sense of forces but, with general relativity, gravity is not a force, right? It instead determines curvature. To what extent should we be careful using the word "force" in this article? — Quantling ( talk |  contribs) 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC) reply