![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Grand Forks Woolen Mills be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in North Dakota may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article was just now started in a semi-automated way, and could use more attention, perhaps including use of sources that might be found online. Please help! :) Try Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) or Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Or develop from the sources already included in the article. Thanks. -- doncram ( talk) 20:39, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
The (paper) documentation cited from NRHP clearly states the style to be "Commercial vernacular". It makes no mention of the three separate styles which were listed in the article prior to my recent edit, viz: "Early commercial", "Vernacular" and "other".
It is possible that the raw data from NRHP that was used to generate the initial article contains a discrepancy compared to the documentary data, but I have no easy way to check this. In the circumstances, I have gone with the documentary info because that is more accessible and would appear to be the original source for NRHP listing. If there indeed is a discrepancy then it may need to be noted in the article somewhere, somehow ... and the same issue probably would arise on hundreds of other articles. - Sitush ( talk) 16:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)