This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I agree: This entry is a right-wing fairy tale similar to those told about Reagan, but I would add that there are a few relevant criticisms sprinkled in, which makes for a bizarre read. This has to be one of the worst wikis I've ever seen. Sgsmith, nola ( talk) 04:45, 30 July 2011 (UTC) perhaps a mention of his renewable energy initiative?
I added the POV tag to target the many pro-Bush phrases used, such as:
Now, personally, I'm not his biggest fan, but I think the above examples speak for themselves. Although, in fairness, I think it's fair to say that a significant number of articles on major politicians suffer from a lack of NPOV; red and blue. Now that's an issue that needs to be resolved, not an excuse or reason to allow bias in politicians' articles.
-- J. Atkins ( talk - contribs) 14:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
There's nothing like revisionist history.
Bush's record on the Texas economy and education system are some of the worst in the state's history.
This entry is a right-wing fairy tale similar to those told about Reagan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.243.185.116 ( talk) 19:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm curious to know why the article says Bush "signed the execution warrants for more death row inmates than any other Governor" when in Texas that is the job of trial court judges. Did Bush usurp the judiciary power? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.96.152 ( talk) 02:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 13:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Governorship of George W. Bush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 04:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)