The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
FYI: I prefer no citations in the lead, so my suggestion is to repeat the information and cite in the body. I always check to see that the lead summary has all information cited in the body.
Y Gothaer Waggonfabrik is mentioned in the lead but not in the body
I figured Gotha and Gothaer Waffonfabrik were close enough for readers to grasp that they were the same company, but I've added a parenthetical note--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk)
15:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Y Marine-Fliegerabteilung is mentioned in the lead but not in the body
Y "compared to aircraft with the more common tractor configuration with the engine in the nose and was not approved for production." not mentioned and cited in the body
Testing by the Seaplane Experimental Command (Seeflugzeug-Versuchs-Kommando) at Warnemünde revealed that the WD.3 was overweight and had mediocre performance. The command therefore ruled out the possibility of any further pusher-configuration aircraft.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk)
15:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Y "its ultimate fate is unknown." not sure I see this information in the body.
Y "the same month that World War I" Consider linking WWI in the body?
It's a pretty short article
Y "which showed that the project was not a high priority" consider expanding upon why developing the plane in 13 months showed that the project was not a high priority.
Clarified
Y "WD.3 was overweight and had mediocre performance" consider explaining or describing how much heavier and how mediocre the performance in comparison or related to expectations.
Y Not sure how I can access these sources. Any ideas? I can AGF based on your editing history but I would be satisfied if I could confirm several citations.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline.
Yes
2b.
reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.