This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article was nominated for
deletion on 9 June 2011. The result of
the discussion was redirect.
yeah maybe i was a little too quick on the speedy, you have to admit though the first draft of the article looked like speedy delete material. I didn't realize it was that well covered in the media.
Karl 334☞TALK to ME ☜22:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Definitely, the first draft was bordering. Prior to that, I removed a "patent nonsense" speedy on it because I guess someone thought it was a hoax. :) Anyway, good call on the AfD.
PianotechTalk to me!/Contribs22:29, 9 June 2011 (UTC)reply
The topic has Encyclopedic merit. It is a nominal leap in Google theme design, and it has triggered a public and a media interest that does beg dispassionate objective explanation not found elsewhere. It has a 'current events' nature that is best served only by Wikipedia and the knowledgeable editing and expansion found here.