This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with
Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Same comment as
Michig. I tried to move the page back to the original title (Gompa), but was afraid to make a mistake. Maybe some senior editor can help.--
Pseudois (
talk)
18:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Gompa is the standard name in English. Yu Hai is a disruptive editor with a long history of unilateral and controversial moves. The page should be moved back to Gompa as soon as possible.
BabelStone (
talk)
20:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
Ok, this page has now had the same misfortune as Shishapangma (now
Xixabangma). If you really want to get this page back to Gompa, don't make the same mistake we made at Shishapagma. Get an admin to move it back now...before placing a requested move template. Once a requested move discussion is initiated, you will never get it back to Gompa without a consensus and Yu Hai, as you have both pointed out, is not interested in reaching consensus.--
Racerx11 (
talk)
23:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
Gompa. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.