From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Video games , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video games Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games Template:WikiProject Video games video game articles
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
project's importance scale . Summary of
Video games WikiProject open tasks:
AfDs
Merge discussions
Other discussions
No major discussions
Featured content candidates
Good article nominations
DYK nominations
Reviews and reassessments
@
Sergecross73 : Are there specific notability guidelines for video games?
Wicka wicka (
talk )
14:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
WP:VG/GL has plenty of notes on how to write articles, but notability-wise, it mostly just operates on the
general notability guidelines , which isn't met with a one sentence, one barely reliable source article.
Sergecross73
msg me
14:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
reply
@
Sergecross73 : Can you also tell me if the article still requires more citations, or can the box at the top be removed? Thanks!
Wicka wicka (
talk )
16:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
reply
Yup, its good now.
Sergecross73
msg me
17:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
reply
It's been a couple months now and it seems that the article has been cleaned up. Also seems to be more start-class.
Epicandrew1220 (
talk )
17:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
This review is
transcluded from
Talk:Golf Story/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer:
ImaginesTigers (
talk ·
contribs )
13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Tagging this one. Except the full review to be posted on Wednesday (rather than in chunks).
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
13:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Hi,
Lee . Let's get this show on the road.
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
This should be fairly straightforward. A few minor concerns.
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
A few suggestions (see Prose). I've implemented all but one of them. Structurally, the article is in good shape.
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
C. It contains
no original research :
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
Copyvio is down, but will revisit later.
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Prose
From the lead: Originally designed as a Wii U game, it was later released for the Switch due to a lengthy development time and gained assistance from Nintendo to create the game. The subject of this sentence isn't clear. "It was later released for the Switch [...] and gained assistance from Nintendo". Minor re-jiggling needed.
Also from the lead: critics praising the games' tone , should be game's .
A sequel is currently in development for the Switch, named Sports Story with [...] -> A sequel, Sports Story , is currently in development.
[...] originally in development as a Wii U title by Sidebar Games' -> Sidebar Games
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
13:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
This was a straightforward one after all. Promoting.
ImaginesTigers (
talk )
20:00, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply