This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Godspy has been covered in the Seattle Times, Dallas Morning News, Houston Chronicle, New Jersey Record, just to name a few. A couple of those have now been included as sources (actually they were deleted along with the last version of the article due to editorial haste - I will reinsert them shortly). In fact, in the Houston Chronicle it was covered in a section called "New & Notable". The magazine features major writers who have achieved serious note in other areas of publishing, such as its editor
Austen Ivereigh. It also has as theological advisor and contributior the internationally recognized theologian, scientist and author
Lorenzo Albacete who is also a contributor to the Italian periodical Tempi, The New Yorker, Slate, and The New Republic and has been frequently interviewed in the major media, including on CNN, ABC Fox and on EWTN. (Now I'm just touching on a couple aspects of the notability of the publication and its writers...I could go on quite extensively).
Actually, I had cited to the New Jersey Record and to the Houston Chronicle in the earlier version of the article, but the hasty editors deleted it, despite my "hang on" tag. I've readded some of the deleted material and will continue to do so.
Mamalujo (
talk)
22:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)reply
You are incorrect. If you had been conscientious enough to check the archives before making another false statement, you would have found it
here. The ordinary search only returns stories from the last 7 days.
Mamalujo (
talk)
23:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Perhaps someone with a little more technically savvy than me can upload and ad a screenshot image of the site to the infobox.
Mamalujo (
talk)
22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Verification
A quick check on the website shows that the Dallas Morning News website doesn't verify the assertions attributed to that source. Requesting the quote or a link before tagging {{
failed verification}}
Toddst1 (
talk)
22:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)reply
Well, online editions of newspapers usually only make the last week or two of the paper available. If you have access to Lexis/Nexis or a similar news database, it can be easily found. Otherwise, it will require a trip to the library. I assure you the cites are valid. And the first cite with the tag seeking a quote actually HAS a quote from the article.
I also did a search on the Dallas Morning News' site and although the article where they made it their site of the week wasn't accessable from their site, I did find it in their list of "sites of the week"
here. Also, The Record is listed in my database and cited as the New Jersey Record, I believe its formal name may just be "The Record". I believe this is its site
here. But like many papers you probably have to be a subscriber or pay to access its archives of older articles.
Mamalujo (
talk)
23:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)reply