This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This
WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all
LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the
project page or contribute to the
discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The articles at
Girlfriend and
Boyfriend suffer from people trying to say what the word means instead of what the subject is.
Boyfriend is worse, but the problem is significant in both. I recommend that we merge them into a single article, perhaps taking over the
Romantic partner redirect as the name, and focusing on the encyclopedic subject. That means:
less about the word
less about other subjects that are sometimes described with the same words
less about synonyms
more about what it means to begin and end these relationships (e.g., is it a
rite of passage?)
more about the social implications (e.g., is it meant to progress towards cohabitation or marriage?)
more about the demographics (e.g., age at first becoming a boyfriend/girlfriend?)
more about how the concept of being a romantic partner differs across time and cultures (e.g., in 1950s America, it was acceptable to have multiple girlfriends/boyfriends).
Oppose. I read both and I don't see this as being a good way of covering this. It's like merging
man into
woman,
boy into
girl, or
male into
female - sure, one could put the merged article under some gender neutral title, but it still would be an awkward combined article. I don't think we can make merge decisions based on content that does not yet exist, and may not exist for many years or ever, while at the same time talking about it being 'less' of the existing content, even though that stuff is still here. Sometimes encyclopedia articles are heavily or exclusively focused on words or phrases; e.g.,
LGBT. A major concern of mine, also, is that a merged article under "romantic partner" would be a
WP:CFORK of
Romance (love), which can often lead to fragmented or even contradictory coverage of a subject. All of what you say under "more about" should be covered there. Incidentally, the
Romantic partner redirect should probably go to that article, not to
Love. Crossroads-talk-05:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose, per
Crossroads. These are completely different terms, it's not feasible or logical to merge them. We should improve this article instead. Also, this would probably mess up the userboxes that link to these pages.
Herbfur (
talk)
15:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Oppose, per the other two users. I understand what the OP is saying, but their suggestions can be added to the existing article, improving it in that way, rather than merging the two pages together. Also, the terms "boyfriend" and "girlfriend" have significance to the gay and lesbian communities, as they use them, so combining them would undoubtedly lead to more confusion.
Historyday01 (
talk)
22:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment. This was proposed back in August and every single comment has been in opposition. How (and why) is this discussion still open? Shouldn't an admin or the OP close this?
Historyday01 (
talk)
19:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.