This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in
film,
literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Not at all; your reviews are great. Thank you for doing them! There's only one left, and I probably won't be bringing any more to GA for a while, so it would be great if you'd review that too.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
01:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)reply
I note that you have included Ashley 2000, but not cited it- have you perhaps made a mistake with your citations again?
No, thank God. I don't want to be that embarrassed twice in a day. I added it to the refs list thinking I would use it, but it doesn't have anything not in the other refs, so I've dropped it.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
01:10, 13 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Our article
The Signal-Man has a dash in the title of Dickens's short story- how was it titled in the magazine?
It's spelled "The Signalman" in the source I have, and also in
this bibliographic index. It may be that the article we have is correct for the original printing, but I think we should stick with the source spelling for this article, since we don't have anything to say it wasn't spelled that way in the magazine.
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
23:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Can we have some kind of link for "slick paper"? This is not going to be familiar to most.
"In March 1930 Harold Hersey took over as publisher, but he was unable to revive the magazine's fortunes" You don't mention the sale in the main body, just the lead
"both published by League Publications, a subsidiary of MacFadden-Bartell, which owned the rights to the original stories." Why?
I don't have a reliable source for this (my source just states they owned the rights) but per
Macfadden Communications Group it seems clear that Macfadden-Bartell still retained the copyright to the magazine in the 1960s as they were a direct descendant of Macfadden's original company. Does this need to be explained in the article?
Mike Christie (
talk -
contribs -
library)
01:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)reply