Geosynthetics was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
I have rewritten and extended the article. Although it is by no means finished it has a backbone of a good article hopefully. Further edits, extensions and comments will be welcommed.
Grahams Child20:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)reply
I don't think this yet qualifies as well written - each paragraph seems more like a short definition than encyclopaedic prose. The bullet pointed list under disadvantages should be converted to prose. And section headings need to follow the capitalisation described in the
WP:MOS. Finally, a standard width should be used for images for aesthetic reasons. Alternating left and right alignment also usually looks better.
Worldtraveller11:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)reply