This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I have a question. 1717, Duckett does his book on the value of ecclesiastical lands at the time of the dissolution. I follow others by saying that's apolitical, but I'm not at all sure that it is. George I is on the throne, and he's low church. Monasteries and religious houses still existed in the Anglican church. More to the point, th church held a lot of land. Would a thing like this have been bait to the king -- a promise of a man who is not afraid to tell the crown how much they could get by taking the lands of the church? Could it have been a threat to the bishops? It's quite a time to do a book like that, and, given how everything else Duckett did was Whig, I wonder if it is innocent. Wondering isn't enough, of course, for including in the article.
Geogre (
talk)
13:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)reply
Unboxing Day
The box on this article competed with the lede and said.... Well, it said that he was an MP and attorney, which is what the first sentence said. It then had his descendants. Well, genealogy is something Wikipedia is not. A succession box for MP is fine, I suppose, if it's at the bottom of the article, where people wanting to know the history of a seat may find it. There isn't anything about Duckett that really makes him boxable, and so it was noise, not signal.
Utgard Loki (
talk)
14:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)reply