This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Mr. Fieger is one of the best trial lawyers, however, politics has stifled his ability to fight for his clients in the Michigan Court of Appeals and the Michigan Supreme Court... [1] See also [ [2]]
-- Frankoooo 04:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Epsoul 05:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Fieger is a controversial, and oft-reversed, attorney, and the current version of the article gives no indication of it. [3] -- TedFrank 23:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
I spent a little time today cleaning the article up - I added an infobox, put things in a more logical order, formatted it a bit better, and tried to find language that conveyed both Fieger's strengths and weaknesses. He's had a couple of notable professional successes, but he's also prone to shooting off his mouth and hitting himself in the foot (to mix a metaphor). In short he's neither a wizard nor a charlatan and and I think the balance is pretty fairly captured now. Seeing the history here of the POV tag, it's proper to remove it, and I've done so. JohnInDC ( talk) 20:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a section that an assertion in the section on what he said "that his opponent John Engler was the product of barnyard miscegenation;" The link to the Michigan Review is gone and it is repeated in the Washington Post without citation. Can we take this as a case of someone saying something like "a cross between a jackass and a dumb ass" or somesuch other, ill-chosen but not defamatory speech? Unless he said something specifically vulgar and offensive (that is citable) I am deleting this one. Petropetro ( talk) 06:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy to delete the Category Detroit College of Law alumni. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 15:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geoffrey Fieger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)