Geneva drive is a former
featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the
archive.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
While a very interesting article -- this ranks up there with the
square drill bit for me :) -- I find the paragraph on internal Geneva drives quite confusingly worded. Could someone with insight have a go at restating it for the terminally dumb ;) --
Turbothy00:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)reply
Don't we
have to separate the Maltese Cross which like every cross always has four arms from the more general term Star Wheel that may be three- or five-armed, and so on ? Filmtechniker--
80.219.134.244 (
talk)
09:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)reply
I'd say the most important difference is that the (depicted) internal version has no locking function between steps, or has it? This might be an issue for many applications. However, this could obviously be solved, so it might be just a problem for the selected wiki animation? --
79.214.39.237 (
talk)
16:32, 25 August 2013 (UTC)reply
The main difference is in the ratio between moving/stationary times. External Genevas are much more common because they have the (often useful) effect of this "snap" action.
Geneva mechanisms are also used for precision object placement throughout extreme temperature ranges. They are used within cryogenic temperature chambers to rotate precision apertures into and out of position. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
174.18.113.149 (
talk)
18:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The Geneva drive is a
gear mechanism that translates a continuous
rotation into an intermittent rotary motion. The rotating drive wheel has a pin that reaches into a slot of the driven wheel advancing it by one step. The drive wheel also has a raised circular blocking disc that locks the driven wheel in position between steps. Such a mechanism is used in film projectors, watches, and
indexing tables, among others.Animation:
Mike1024
Forgive me if I just don't get it, but: The internal section says "The angle by which the drive wheel has to rotate to effect one step rotation of the driven wheel is always smaller than 180° in an external Geneva drive and always greater than 180° in an internal one" - it looks like 360 degrees in both the animations (external and internal), to me. So I have no idea why it says this, or what it could mean if not what I think it means.
110.20.168.169 (
talk)
23:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
It's correct, although could be clearer.
A geneva wheel isn't a simple gear ratio, even though it has a gearing-down effect for speed. It's main characteristic is that the riven wheel is stationary for some of the cycle and moves in intermittent steps - for all of them, the driving wheel makes one complete revolution to turn the driven wheel by a step. The statement here is about the proportion of 360º rotation of the driving wheel for which it's turning the driven wheel, and how much is ineffectual (i.e. no driven rotation happening).
For the external geneva, the movement phase is always less than 180º (short moves and long gaps), for the internal geneva it's always long moving phase and short gap.
Andy Dingley (
talk)
01:18, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Ohh hehe thank you! :-) So given that it means that, perhaps "The angle by which the drive wheel has to rotate to effect one step rotation of the driven wheel" isn't a good way of saying that? That phrase still sounds like me to mean.. uh what it literally means. 360 deg. Well, you're the expert, but for me, (and well, WP should be written by experts for laymen/noobs!) something like 'The driven wheel of an external drive is stationary most of the time" etc would be infinitely clearer. Thanks again; that was just baffling.
110.20.168.169 (
talk)
07:29, 22 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Please read my “suggested source”. The design is more complex than you would assume. Some people do not like trial and error (While i was ignorant, the one i designed would not rotate properly because the arc in the rotor would rotate into the cross as it turned - because the bars on either side of the slots were flared too wide. Then I realised that the shafts more than likely need to be a certain distance apart, so I hunted for formulas.) And to correct you, there are seven formulas.
Charlieb000 (
talk)
01:52, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply
That's rather the problem. As there is no single formula for this (if there was, the maths would be unpleasantly discontinuous) it's stated instead as a set of separate conditions. If you want to express the design constraints, then the right-angled triangle might be the clearest way to express these, rather than some formula. It shows the need for the pin to engage with the slot in a purely radial direction, it also makes the limit on slot depth needed quite easy to see. Personally though I've always found them pretty easy to design (I laser cut stuff and make automata).
Andy Dingley (
talk)
08:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)reply