This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Gangga Negara article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thats good. There are too many flaws in this article. The correct archeological and anthropological evidences is not being realesed by the official incharge in this country. Please note that there is also lack of any interesting citations which depicts poor research on this field by the author.
I've removed this paragraph as it has no citation(s) and resembles personal opinion.
"before all of that there was a princess who helped her father ruled the entire gangga nagaram.The ancient hindus was guardung upon something very powerful source. Some said there was a war occured something really terrific. But till now have not get a hint about it. Even before anyone else the hinduism was here ,the entire city falls on 1026. So from that we can state that the ruler of this land was Indians.But how does islam came here is the question. Perhaps some believes that they were just pirates wjo conquered the land and claimed it is theirs." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjovn ( talk • contribs) 23:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
N.J.Ryan argues that in Kedah in the North-West of the Malaysian peninsula, there was no large immigration of Indian settlers; rather there was the influence of traders and missionaries. These people, rather like the Europeans in later centuries, were responsible for popularizing their way of life and religion. Many inhabitants - Malay by race - became Hindu or Buddhists, and they built the temples whose remains have been found in Kedah. Thus the population of Kedah for example, did not change, and CHINESE REPORT AFFIRM that the native societies had adopted Indian culture but had not become Indian colonies. [1976:8] (I got this from Tamil Historian paper work-TAMILINFLUENCEMALAY by T.Wignesan ,Docteur d’Etat ès lettres et sciences human ,University of Paris-I-Panthéon-Sorbonne)
I've removed the following. It's irrelevant. And I contest the following uncited statement:
__earth ( Talk) 12:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
In the article, "Artefacts on display include a 128kg cannon, swords, kris, coins, tin ingots, pottery from the Ming Dynasty and various eras, and large jars. "
Are you sure? Cannon that large from the 6th century? __earth ( Talk) 12:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Correction: "Other artefacts on display...." L joo 07:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Gangga Negara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)