This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This should be merged with the Computer Gaming World wiki. They are the same magazine, just changed names. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Vette92 (
talk •
contribs)
Support Now that Games for Windows has been folded into the 1UP website and ceased production of the print magazine, this issue should be revisited. Computer Gaming World lasted 25 years, Games for Windows a year and a half. Despite having different names, it was the same magazine. They were not seperate entities, nothing changed but the title and a few extra pages of Microsoft sponsored ads. Two separate articles are unnecessary. Two extra sections can be added to the CGW article, one for the GFW name change, one for the cancellation. - (
Satertek (
talk)
23:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC))reply
Oppose
Your opposing vote here.
Oppose Although they are the same magazine in spirit, they are completely different and one of the articles would be undermined by the other.
Userpie01:31, 11 March 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose As others have stated, they're not the same, quite simply. Same staff, same company, different magazine. Just by looking at both it's obvious.
Enfestid05:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)reply
Oppose They're flat out not the same magazine. Just because they're related and from the same company doesn't mean they're the same thing. This certainly deserves its own article.
Brianreading (
talk)
19:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)reply
Please go to
the image description page and edit it to include a
fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot10:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)reply