From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
PerryPerryD (
talk ·
contribs ) 17:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
I am PerryPerryD and I will be performing this review. I accept any and all assistance from other editors in this review. I will begin as soon as i can.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
17:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a (prose, spelling, and grammar) : b (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
Head verified as good, Layout is efficient, resourceful, and consice. No Typographical Errors found. Follows the Manual of Style. Fiction is a bit difficult here, but after a thorough analysis, I confirmed that it passes Fiction. Approved.
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a (
reference section ) : b (citations to
reliable sources ) : c (
OR ) : d (
copyvio and
plagiarism ) :
Headbomb Reliability Script assisted, unreliable sources point to reviews or quotes, therefor reliable. Manually checked sources. Approved.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
18:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
It is broad in its coverage .
a (
major aspects ) : b (
focused ) :
Article is able to describe the characters backstory without going to far. into it. Its able to describe the character and not focus on the game itself. It is broad, yet doesnt have more than what it needs. Approved.
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
Self Fixed Head Neutrality.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
18:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales ) : b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Venus illustation may not be needed for the context or to support the claim of this article. Image reassesed. Image supports the article. Approved.
Overall :
Pass/Fail :
Very impressive. The article passes all of the criteria as far as I can tell after 4 days of analysis. Approved for GA. Congratulations.
PerryPerryD
Talk To Me
15:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
reply