![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This post needs to be updated. If you don't know what is correct you could just put "there was general consensus 10,20 years ago that these were the things that it did, but now that there are better imaging techniques we know far more about what it does and the below is no longer correct, besides not being anywhere specific enough to be accurate." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.59.252 ( talk) 08:19, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
Whats the deal with the last 5 functions? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.158.147.36 (
talk)
00:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Is further information regarding the role of the fusiform gyrus in synesthesia relevant? Classic studies on synesthesia by V.S. Ramachandran provide a lot of information on the fusiform gyrus and its connections, and the conclusions are substantiated by recent research as well, despite the age of the studies. [1] Brainbowboy ( talk) 15:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Main edits should work with organization of the Function section. Disclaimer regarding relative consensus can be kept in the beginning, but the division of topics such as "processing of color information" and "face and body recognition" should be followed by their respective content. Currently, the topics are outlined and then described together in one conglomerate paragraph. Rather, each type of function should be organized into individual subsections under the larger "Function" section.
Anyone have any thoughts about this?
Mister Meeseeks ( talk) 16:02, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Brainbowboy ( talk) 16:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Please clarify this sentence and provide a citation.
128.84.201.19 ( talk) 15:48, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I would recommend expanding on the dyslexia section. The sentence provided seems a bit unclear. Sailor4510 ( talk) 15:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Maybe discuss the relation between the two? It would be great to see the information obtained from the cited source.
Binkboy ( talk) 16:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
The intro has great info, but the last couple sentences both need citations. ExpressElevatortoHell ( talk) 16:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Also, I'm not sure if reference #14 is an appropriate source. It's original research and it's not a review article. ExpressElevatortoHell ( talk) 16:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
"The exact functionality of the fusiform gyrus is still disputed, but there is relative consensus on its involvement in the following pathways". A citation might be good here, since you are saying that it's functionality is a disputed subject. Michoupichou ( talk) 16:03, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
"The lateral and medial portions are separated by the shallow mid-fusiform sulcus." This seems kind of vague to me. The portions of that specific part of the brain? Michoupichou ( talk) 16:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)