This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Fritz Johann Hansgirg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fritz Johann Hansgirg. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fritz Johann Hansgirg at the Reference desk. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Hi @ Checkingfax: If you get a chance, and some time, can you please review/clean up this article please? Thanks, as always, for your kind help. Picomtn ( talk) 10:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi @ Checkingfax: I'm still not sure how to the portal thing at the bottom of the article, but I'm working on it. Thanks. Picomtn ( talk) 10:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
{{
Portal}}
, {{
Portal-inline}}
, and {{
Portal bar}}
. Do a preview to make sure your portals are live. If you see a puzzle piece for an image then right-click on that link (if you're on a PC) and go see what the real portal name is. 1930s as you can see is not a valid Portal name. Cheers! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
10:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Hi @ Nordosm: I've started on this article so it is ready for the additional information you have to add to it. Hope this helps you. Picomtn ( talk) 10:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
I'm writing Dr. Hansgirg's biography, but I can't share more about his life or the science until publication. My co-author is a nuclear physicist who has analyzed Hansgirg's inventions thoroughly. - Bill Streifer -- Photografr7 ( talk) 12:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi @ Checkingfax:In the bibliography for this article I've listed two scientific references that explain, and mention Hansgirg directly, his achievements. I am not able, however, to fully comprehend the science here and am hoping that someone more familier with this can (hopefully in plain English) explain it better than I have. Thanks. Picomtn ( talk) 11:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
11:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)References
Hi Picomtn and any other interested editors. The lead now contains information that is not repeated in the article. The lead is supposed to be a nickel tour (showing somebody around the place) of each section of the article, without giving any section extra weight. For example, the Manhattan Project is mentioned in the lead but not in the article; the atomic bomb is mentioned in the lead but not in the article.
Please review WP:LEADCREATE for an essay on how to create and manage a good lead.
Sometimes it is best to write the article and then backtrack to build out a separate lead section based on the built out article. Once the article is stable, building out the lead becomes easier. Cheers! {{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
22:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
08:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Hi @ Checkingfax: I did understand what you were saying lead vs. body. However, it is going to take an expert to read through the science Hansgirg contributed to showing how it exactly relates to the creation of the atomic bomb. Hansgirg's contributions to the Manhattan Project, at least from my initial grasp of this subject, is very substantial, but, and again, way beyond my expertise to articulate. Also, Hansgirg's heavy water invention needs much more explaining than I'm able to accomplish and, likewise, needs an expert to explain. In fact, an entire new section to Hansgirg's article can be written showing how the Soviet Union used his inventions, after they captured his plants in northern Korea, in making their own atomic bomb--but, and again, the science is too complex for me to explain. What are your thoughts? Picomtn ( talk) 09:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
09:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Hi Johnfos, Gronk Oz and Dawnseeker2000: Since you recently edited the Nuclear weapon article, I was wondering if you could review this one and, hopefully, help to improve it by explaining the science. My belief in this articles subject, like that of Karl-Hermann Geib, is due to their being neglected/marginalized by the passage of time, which, if allowed to continue, may erase them forever. As the creation of the atomic bomb can be viewed as one of the most significant events in human history, the people (all of them, and all over the world) who contributed to it should be historically noted. Thanks. Picomtn ( talk) 09:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
19:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Hi @ Checkingfax and Nordosm: There needs to be another article written here on the CECE process so that it can be linked back to Hansgirg and both the U.S. and Soviet atomic bomb projects. This process is still be used today in the U.S., but I don't know about Russia. Thanks. Picomtn ( talk) 11:48, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
You are clearly hurried with the introduction and conclusion to the article on Fritz Johann Hansgirg. "Hansgirg and atomic bombs" is fake. About Bill Streifer should be written in the article Sorcha Faal. However, he is inadequate and fantasist fellow, not a provocateur. But the result of this is independent. In a nutshell. Hansgirg is loser. Its magnesium process anywhere ever successfully worked. Also concentrated heavy water can not be obtained on his installation. He patented technology is only half. I'm on facebook tried to explain this Bill Streifer in bad English. However, it is not a a language, but in the brain. I also wrote to him that there is no significant trace of Korean in the Soviet atomic project. Bill Streifer has personal knowledge ( Polanyi), which will go see him in the grave. Nordosm ( talk) 20:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
References