 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Freak folk page were merged into Psychedelic folk on 9 June 2018 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
What are some characteristics of freak folk? The article lists artists associated with the genre, but that doesn't give a specific idea of what is considered "freak folk." Blackmorningsun 18:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Bands from the 1960s like the Holy Modal Rounders and Pearls Before Swine were using the term freak folk in their heyday -- scruss ( talk) 04:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
the godz and the fugs also. it's not new. i was really surprised reading this article that it's considered a new coinage.
Surely Freak Folk is the same genre as Nu-Folk. Perhaps these articles should be merged.
- I think this is completely wrong. am planning on contributing to re-write the categories as they are a mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.194.186 ( talk) 08:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please do: references to nu-folk redirect here. They refer todifferent bands, different periods. Horrid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.168.6 ( talk) 23:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
will anyone, with some relative knowledge, please, make some effort? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.54.184.177 ( talk) 21:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Half-hearted attempt at Coining a new genre doesn't make it so. Will someone please clean this up! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.202.67.242 ( talk) 17:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
I say we merge this article with the Psychedelic Folk and give it it's own section on that page Dekai Averett ( talk) 13:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Merger complete.
Klbrain (
talk)
09:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)