This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class.
BetacommandBot09:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)reply
Geologist?
Neumann is categorized as a minerologist. Minerologist are categorized as a sub-category of geologists. So I believe he fits into the guidelines for Geologists from the Kingdom of Prussia. For the time being I have added him to scientists from the Kingdom of Prussia.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In Germany, both the mineralogy and the geology are subdivisions of the geoscience, of course with strong, but not hierarchic connections between them. The geologists mainly work in the field, and the persons listed as German geologists oh the 19th century actually worked in the field (except Franz Neumann and Heinrich Rose). Franz Neumann was a mineralogist, who was interested in the mathematical and physical properties of crystals, and in general, he is seen as one of the fathers of mathematical physics in Germany. He never worked in the fields, and thus I think, his categorization to "geologist" may be misleading to the reader. --
Dioskorides (
talk)
12:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia categories are not country specific. We organize Wikipedia categories based on standard understanding of terms and domains. We use the terms as they are understood in standard usage,not local specific usage.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
20:36, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You're going to have to explain what you mean by "standard". Because that's not the same thing as consensus. We have ENGVAR as well, which is like the opposite of following "standard".
Mason (
talk)
21:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)reply