![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 December 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Relatively to the banner above, there are reasons to suspect that all the users are in fact the same (see WP:PUPPET).-- Japs 88 ( talk) 15:26, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
If this doesn't qualify for self-promotion I don't know what does. The article is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.134.207.32 ( talk) 19:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
The main contributor to this article is one Wikisannino, which certainly casts suspicions that this contributor is in fact the subject of the article himself. Looking at his contributions, this user account seems to have been created for the sole purpose of editing the present article. If this is not blatant self-promotion I don't know what it is. Furthermore, there are claims of notability, but no secondary source to support it. An EU commission grant is not a major national or international award. Puffino ( talk) 17:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Neutral point of view: All the information are verifiable via secondary sources. Notability: The information are again all verifiable. The article reports simply neutral facts about a known scientist. I have checked several other scientists profiles on Wiki, including the ones added by Puffino and this profile is in line with those. A comment about EU commission grants of excellence: Only few selected scientists have received this grant. There is also a Danish grant of excellence [1] not reported in the article. SilvesterCat ( talk) 17:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
If this physicist is on Wikipedia, then there must be millions!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.84.134.230 ( talk) 09:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Should it be mentioned that the author always cites his own papers with a ratio of 1/3? This generate, on the published papers, a boost of his total citation count of almost 60% (3,698 to 5,909), of the average citation count of almost 60% (27 to 43), and the h-index of about 25% (31 to 39). He's a clear case of a clever physicists trying to use several methods to boost his name. This wiki entry is another element used to boost up his importance. 50.75.99.161 ( talk) 17:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)