This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
I am new to editing anything on Wikipedia and I would just like some guidance on what is and isn't accepted content to fill out the entry about our organization. For instance, I am curious why the key people section I added was removed, only because I'm not familiar with the norms or standards. I would appreciate any advice or help in understanding what things are ok to add and what probably shouldn't be added.
Reading this and checking the reporting on what this think tank actually does, I am very positive there is a neutrality issue here.
The Criticisms section was simply removed without discussing it here and while there is clear evidence that the think tank is conservative, that designation was removed as well.
CrazyPredictor (
talk)
19:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)reply
I have added back the Criticisms section, as well as the "conservative" designation for the think tank as well as the "POV" tag which is clearly warranted.
Source to prove that the FGA is a conservative think-tank?
Based on the contents of this article, the FGA only advocates for fiscally conservative economic policies but this has no mention about any socially conservative policies. Would this make them more of a libertarian-conservative think-tank?
TrickshotsBSYT (
talk)
03:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)reply