This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the
Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Empire of Japan#Japanese offensives (1941–42)|Japanese]] The anchor (#Japanese offensives (1941–42)) is no longer available because it was
deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
I've just assessed this article as start class. This was because none of the details in the 'El Fraile in literature' section are referenced and the entire article is dependent on a single reference (albeit what looks like a good one). I'd suggest that American Defenses of Corregidor and Manila Bay 1898-1945 be consulted. The 'In popular culture' section should also be removed as it's pretty trivial.
Nick-D (
talk)
11:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)reply
It looks as though what used to be references have become much lowlier "sources" due to heavy (and undiscussed) edits which removed "cruft". Compare some of the older versions. The details of the destruction of the fort for example came from Yank magazine.
Sdoradus (
talk)
12:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Sorry, but I didin't norice the other source, by which i mean Yank Magazine. The prose seemed choppy, so I axed it and the pop culture section with no refs. I'll look it over again.
Buggie111 (
talk)
15:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply