Moisejp, hello. I'm delighted you could take this review! I might give the article a read-through myself, because even though it's only been a month or so since I nominated it, I really can't remember anything about it …
JG66 (
talk)
23:02, 28 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Ha! In fact, I remember coming to this thinking that it would be nice and straightforward (little in the way of background; simple 12-bar composition; no risk of complicated, alt interpretations). So I was slightly surprised that it ended up as long as it has.
JG66 (
talk)
14:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Initial comments:
The Let It Be... Naked article says a different mix was released on that album. Probably worth mentioning (or did you and I missed it?).
Quite right, yes. The mention of reinstating the full acoustic gtr part at Naked is unsourced (it's quite true, though), but I've added what I could find.
JG66 (
talk)
15:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, definitely. Thinkin about it, now that I've just added the Anthology 3 take there, do you think we should lose the mention of the Best of GH compilation?
JG66 (
talk)
15:03, 29 October 2016 (UTC)reply
I don't have a strong opinion, but I think it's OK to leave it in. It's somewhat significant in that Capitol Records deemed it one of George's most important Beatles songs.
Yes, that's the point – that Capitol saw fit to include it on a greatest hits collection. I just wasn't sure on reflection whether the significance of this would mean anything to the average reader. Will leave as is, then.
JG66 (
talk)
05:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
Wow, fabulous. Thanks so much, Moisejp – that really was very pleasant, as always, but incredibly speedy also! Cheers,
JG66 (
talk)
05:32, 30 October 2016 (UTC)reply