Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on November 19, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on April 12, 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Jay Rothman is no longer Chairman and CEO at Foley & Lardner LLP. The new Chairman and CEO is Daljit Doogal. Can we please get this updated to reflect the change in leadership?
Cite: https://www.crainsdetroit.com/law/new-foley-lardner-ceo-daljit-doogal-takes-helm-amid-fight-talent
This report is about [half of] the "Edit comment" for this edit:
That edit comment says:
(Added a notable employee Brian Hagedorn, who also worked for this law firm. And I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court.)
( Tag: Visual edit)
; but the portion of that edit comment after the word "And", -- (namely << "I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court." >>), -- does not agree with the changes made, according to the DIFF listing.
The change made, (other than the one involving adding Brian Hagedorn), was an update to the entry for " Joan F. Kessler, Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge"; ...NOT to the entry for "Lisa Neubauer".
I am not sure whether the article is correct now ("as of" that "Revision as of 13:33, 30 March 2019" edit); but if it is, then that edit comment is wrong.
(Perhaps worse), if that edit comment is right, then the article is wrong now -- (that is, the addition of "and candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court," may have been done ...in the wrong place in the article).
Either way, [it seems that] something is wrong. -- Mike Schwartz ( talk) 07:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)