This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Focke-Wulf Fw 190 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Smoon126.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
To comply with Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Aircraft) there should only be one set of specs. This has already caused one editor to wrongly revert a legitimate edit. So I am putting this up for discussion; the issue seems to be that the Dora and similar high altitude derivatives should also have specs. I contend that if they are that differtent then a breakaway / sub article should be written to cover them, which would allow the inclusion of a specifications section on the Dora (or whichever variant the author chooses) Discuss:-- Petebutt ( talk) 23:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
When was the name chosen and was it used? There is no current coverage in the article about the name origin. GraemeLeggett ( talk) 11:47, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
& we really aren’t going to mention how one was taken down by the safety valve of a tank locomotive it destroyed? That gallant ol’ kettle on rails wasn’t going quietly without a fight, so I think it at least deserves a sentence or two on this page NewfieRailFan ( talk) 11:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC)