This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Flash evaporation article. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting articles
Extensive re-write
The article seemed to be focused only on the flash evaporation of a multi-component liquid and it did not discuss the evaporation of a single-component liquid at all. Also, some of the wording was confusing. Hence, I did an extensive re-write. I will complete the multi-component section with the next day or so. -
mbeychok05:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Is the fact that flash evaporators are isentropic true for both multi-component systems as well as single? What are some properties of all flash evaporators?
143.246.14.19 (
talk)
18:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)PhysicsStudentreply
Glad you brought this up, because I erred in stating that the flash evaporation of a single-component liquid is isentropic. An adiabatic process is isentropic only if the process is reversible. I have corrected the article to state that the flash evaporation of a single-component liquid is isenthalpic. answer you In any event, the equation given for a single-component liquid is correct.
mbeychok (
talk)
22:11, 14 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Now that I have checked the article history, I see that I originally wrote that flash evaporation of a single-component liquid was isenthalpic. The change to isentropic was made by an unregistered user on March 23, 2009. So the error was not mine after all.
mbeychok (
talk)
22:35, 14 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Derivation of Flash Evaporation Single Component & Definition of X
Mass Balance of initial and final liquid and vapour
Adiabatic energy balance
or in articles original notation
The current article also suggests (from definition X = weight fraction vaporized) that X = m_vap ÷ m_total, where m_total = m_vap+m_liq, which is is the same definition as
vapor quality. From the derivation, X should be defined as the 'ratio' of vaporised mass to remaining liquid.
I have just modified one external link on
Flash evaporation. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.