This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 5, 2007, September 5, 2008, September 5, 2009, September 5, 2010, September 5, 2014, and September 5, 2020. |
I am going to leave the most recent edit by Reese1031 as it is, but I would like to see the article changed to reflect Rhode Island's participation, and a reference provided for same. If this is not done, I will revert to the previous version which indicates that Rhode Island did not participate in the First Continental Congress. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 17:55, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
56 or 55? This website says fifty-five: http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h650.html it's 56 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Siddharth9200 ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
I want this question to be answered short —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.251.182 ( talk) 00:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Reference to the Journals of The Continental Congress 1774-1789, Vol I, page 30.
As recorded, that on this date, September 14, 1774, the two deputies from North Carolina, William Hooper and Joseph Hewes, Esqrs. attended the Congress and produced their credentials.
The article would lead one to believe that all the delegates were present as of September 5, 1774. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.49.66.19 ( talk) 14:07, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Firstcontinentalcongress.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 04:08, 16 December 2011 (UTC) |
Another major accomplishment seems to be missing, namely the Declaration of Colonial Rights and Grievances. Is there any particular reason why it was not included? Otherwise, it really should be added. -- Polymatheia ( talk) 10:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC) I like ween — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.181.196.173 ( talk) 04:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Continental Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
208.84.138.79 ( talk) 18:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
i would like to edit the day it happed
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Continental Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Dilidor ( talk · contribs) apparently has no understanding of basic punctuation. He first reverted my edit that (among other things) added a handful of missing commas per WP:Copyedit#Punctuation. I then notified him on his talkpage of the above guideline.
I now find that he, instead of replying, has reverted me again(!), with the ridiculous comment "do not begin a revert war; take it to talk". Ok, I'm doing that now, although I was close to taking it to WP:ANI.
Let's see what happens. The WP:ANI avenue remains open.
HandsomeFella ( talk) 14:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
unsigned comment added by 2601:802:8102:2E59:CCF3:D3D9:4616:EC90 ( talk) 20:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
No one in 1774 called it that. It wasn’t until the Second one that this one had ”first” anachronically added to it. I’ve tried to fix it, wasted my time (see history), so someone else can deal with it. deisenbe ( talk) 17:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
It honestly, doesnt matter what they called it back then. Technically, its now is the First Continental Congress. We did refer to it as the First Continental Congress AFTER the second one, but the second one is over now so the proper term is "The First Continental Congress" But I am sure everyone appreciates your historical lesson. September 12, 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:802:8102:2E59:CCF3:D3D9:4616:EC90 ( talk) 20:58, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
It seems that the citation #8 under "Notes" has been changed to an incorrect address and should be changed (back) to http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=lljc&fileName=001/lljc001.db&recNum=109 as it had been on an old version of the page. Myfriendben ( talk) 05:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
What is that portrait when you google the Website. Some random young man is the thumbnail that shoes up in the snippet. could you change to the first painting of the congress. 67.170.18.93 ( talk) 07:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Was not Charles Thomson a delegate to the 1st Continental Congress? His name is missing from the list of the Pennsylvania delegates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianUS18thcentury ( talk • contribs) 00:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Search engine photo must be changed 2601:84:837C:6A0:DD1F:2306:C6A9:D9E ( talk) 00:54, 16 July 2024 (UTC)