From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Jaguar (
talk ·
contribs)
15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon.
JAG
UAR
15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
-
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (
MoS for
lead,
layout,
word choice,
fiction, and
lists):
- It is factually accurate and
verifiable.
- a (
reference section):
b (citations to
reliable sources):
c (
OR):
- No original research found.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (
major aspects):
b (
focused):
- It follows the
neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have
fair use rationales):
b (
appropriate use with
suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I was going to write a couple of points but left them out as I'm sure it wasn't worth it
JAG
UAR
19:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
reply