![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
.
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
StarMississippi (talk) all your observations on the above referenced article have been met, eliminated FamilySearch citations, Fjnovoa ( talk) 20:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
The fact that this contributor may be personally related to the subject, does not preclude him from originally writing a professional neutral point of view on political historical article on the subject. More importantly, the contributor for the fact that he may be personally related, has provided a wealth of firsthand data, knows through the oral tradition and provided supporting citations, is an authority as far as search and research for many years on the subject. There is no evidence of makeup nor embellishment of the facts surrounding the subject. 
So, it can be argued that this is a biographical (not autobiography, for the contributor in not contributing about himself) article, that happens to have a political historical significance; or on the other side, a political historical significance biography that happens to be contributed by a personally and well-versed related person. 
The article has been reviewed by academia history scholar (third parties) that are not personally or professionally connected to the contributor nor to the subject, analyzing the sources and citations. And in their opinion, even though there may exist a conflict of interest or a moral hazard, it is neutral point of view, and properly disclosed in the contributor's user page, as it is Wikipedia policy. Fjnovoa ( talk) 20:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
This user does not represent the subject. Once the article was reviewed and approved, this user has edited so that all links are working to other articles that are being in the process of review and approval, or because when they are finally approved, the title of the article has changed, so links from other articles will not work anymore as the draft was submitted. Fjnovoa ( talk)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
The individual photograph of subject is gone. This was a contribution from the family archives, and it belongs to me. I had granted permission to use in Wikipedia. Please advise. Fjnovoa ( talk) 21:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
A new photograph has been reloaded. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Can you please edit the HTML code, so it can be pulled into the officeholder box, by adding the following line below the name: | name = Fidel Antonio Novoa Fuentes
Line to be added | image = Fidel_Antonio_Novoa_Fuentes.jpg Fjnovoa ( talk) 22:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)