![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings! I am currently working on this article for my sociology class. Here is a shorthand bibliography of some of the sources I will be using for this assignment:
How research ethics can impact research on feminism and international relations. [1]
A comparison between feminists and constructivists and how the two ideals can be used hand in hand to turn an ideology into a reality. [2]
Feminist critiques of globalization in order to help the feminist voice in global economics. [3]
These are just a handful of the articles I will be using for editing this page. Thank you for reading and have a great night!
References
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Sseamusobry. Peer reviewers:
Hicfox.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 21:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Great Job editing this article! The info is nicely arranged, the resources are inputted well and the content is thorough. You can expand on the Influence in Politics section, such as how a feminist-constructivist would approach different political issues, and more examples would be helpful. Katherinemariem ( talk) 17:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Greetings,
Sorry I've added my information so late. I've been dealing with a family issue and it really absorbed a lot of my time. I've most recently added some information from Locher and Prügl's academic journal on how feminism is highly critical of constructivism. I also added another citation with both authors. However, I noticed that there was a similar citation to mine and I was wondering which one I should edit. Thank you for reading and have a great day.
Jgesnard ( talk) 08:13, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello everyone,
I've added a couple of headings to better organize the article and started to take the article more into the political aspect of the subject. I feel a lot more comfortable with the direction I'm taking my article in now. Thank you for reading thus far.
Sincerely,
Jgesnard ( talk) 16:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey everyone,
Today I added a new section titled Influence on Research as well as added a plethora of information to that. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jgesnard ( talk) 21:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminist constructivism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi Sseamusobry! The following will be my review of your edits thus far. Your article has some great content, and is quite well-written, but there is just some room for improvement in your formatting/grammar, as well as room for expanding some of the ideas you've already put forth. Hopefully my comments are helpful! :)
Hicfox ( talk) 01:23, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Great Job editing this article! The info is nicely arranged, the resources are inputted well and the content is thorough. Katherinemariem ( talk) 17:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I cleaned up the page a bit after a hiatus that admittedly took way too long. I love the fact that this page got some traction after I initially discovered it back in 2016 and that it's especially now getting some veteran eyes working on it as well. I originally worked on it for a class project and although some of the points may not be completely concise, I do believe the information given does maintain the academic integrity of Wikipedia itself. I will be returning to it soon armed with some new information from Stanford's own Dr. Cecilia Ridgeway.